Copyright Ray Levine 2005 |
Dr Kathleen TaylorResearcher and science writerUniversity of Oxford. To email me click here. |
This page describes some of the books which helped me write Cruelty and Brainwashing (grouped by topic). They're the ones which stuck in my mind, though there were many others! Links are to Amazon.co.uk or, for individuals, to their home pages.
You can find the list of references here.
Three seminal early works on brainwashing are Edward Hunter's
journalistic Brainwashing
and Brain-washing in Red describes CIA
research
into mind control.
Cults,
by Marc Galanter, is a psychological
analysis of cult behaviour, well worth reading, while John Ronson's Them
is a lighter look at extremists of various kinds. There are
many books about cults which focus on a particular cult or
personal experience; fewer attempt to compare or draw general
inferences.
For more on influence techniques, Influence,
by Robert
Cialdini, and Age
of Propaganda
, by Pratkanis
and Aronson, are both very readable. For a psychologist's
investigation of group behaviour, see Ervin Staub,
The
Psychology of Good and Evil
. For
social psychology in general, Hewstone and Stroebe's Introduction
to Social Psychology
is a good
place to start. I used the 3rd edition for Brainwashing;
they're now onto a fourth.
Disgust, that most fascinating and culturally-mediated of
feelings, has received much attention recently, after long neglect
relative to other negative emotions. This is mainly because of its role
in moral feelings and judgements, as notably proposed by Paul Rozin, Jonathan Haidt
and colleagues. William Miller's The
Anatomy of Disgust is one of
several useful summaries; another is Susan Miller's Disgust
. For
background theory, I drew on Mary Douglas's great book Purity
and Danger
.
Daniel
Dennett's Freedom
Evolves is a good, if
at times
fairly technical,
introduction to recent philosophical thinking on free will.
A selection
of classic essays on the subject (warning: very
technical) is
Free
Will
,
edited by Robert Kane.
The analysis of free will in economic terms is
exemplified by George Ainslie's Breakdown
of Will
,
which is also
technical in parts, but well worth the effort.
Much of my reading for Cruelty was
historically-oriented, like Joanna Bourke's
An
Intimate History of Killing
and Christopher Browning's Ordinary
Men
. One of the
books I found most useful is Alex Hinton's Annihilating
Difference
. His work on
the Cambodian genocide, Why
Did They Kill?
, is also of
interest.
Another
key source was Robert Lifton's seminal The
Nazi Doctors
.
On the Rwandan genocide, an informative description of events
from a
concerned outsider's perspective is Romeo Dallaire's Shake
Hands with the Devil,
while Jean Hatzfeld's book A
Time for Machetes
gives great
insight into the
perpetrators' minds.
On terrorism, the 9/11 attacks in the
United States have
hugely increased the amount of literature available. I found Diego
Gambetta's Making
Sense of Suicide Missions
particularly useful. And on torture, John Conroy and Peter Suedfeld
have interesting things
to say in Unspeakable
Acts, Ordinary People
and Psychology
and Torture
respectively.
David Buss's evolutionary psychology book The
Murderer Next Door deals with
more 'everyday' killing. I also learned much
from Roy Baumeister's Evil
and Aaron
Beck's
Prisoners
of Hate
.
Rather than standard works like Steven Pinker's The
Language Instinct,
I would choose to reread Terrence Deacon's excellent Symbolic
Species
.
More recently, how about Daniel Everett's book on the Amazonian Piraha
people, Don't
Sleep, There are Snakes
, which
challenges Chomsky? There's an
informative video about
Everett's work here.
Murray
Edelman's The
Politics of Misinformation and John
Street's
Mass
Media, Politics and Democracy
are good
sources for more information about the
distorting
effects of mass communications. Isaiah
is a classic
of the
field.
To be honest I don't read neuroscience books as a rule; I read
journal articles. However, if you're after academic detail in book form
Cacioppo
and colleagues' Foundations
in Social Neuroscience
will keep you going for quite a while; it's a big tome.
Have
you read Richard Dawkins' The
God Delusion? If
you haven't, it may be a better use of your time to read one of
the many more nuanced books on religion available. Dawkins
writes beautifully on
evolution, but faith's well known capacity for rattling scientists into
substituting polemic for
argument and assertion for evidence has rarely been more obvious. For
alternatives, there's much of
interest in Karen
Armstrong's history
of
religious fundamentalist thinking, The
Battle for God
, Malise
Ruthven's Fundamentalism
and Rene
Girard's riveting classic Violence
and the Sacred
.
The cognitive science of religion - work such as Bob
McCauley's Bringing
Ritual to Mind
- is a rapidly growing field with much of interest to say
about
why religion is so powerful and widespread; you may also like to read
Harvey Whitehouse's work on ritual Modes
of Religiosity
. And of
course there's Daniel
Dennett's Breaking
the Spell
, although
like other people I
feel he places too much weight on
game theory and memes.